Thu 3 Sep 2026
daily since 25 Aug
CONFIRMED
ZENDESK ▲ €1.5 appeared · 3 SepZENDESK ▼ $1.5 withdrawn · 3 SepWIX €29 → €14 · 3 SepTEACHABLE ▼ $10 withdrawn · 3 SepTEACHABLE ▼ $10 withdrawn · 3 SepSURFER SEO ▲ €42.33 appeared · 3 SepSENDPULSE ▼ €7.7 withdrawn · 3 SepROBOFORM ▼ €2.83 withdrawn · 3 Sep
all 59 →
Guide — Method

Form builders: six vendors, six different things a headline price can mean

Every form builder we read prints a monthly figure, and at no two of them does that figure mean the same thing. One is a starting price with no ceiling stated, one is an annual rate with the monthly one only implied, one is a descriptive annual total with no discount claimed, and one belongs to a billing switch that changes nothing. This guide sets out what each kind of figure is, and why the only reliable comparison in this category is one you compute yourself.

Form builders look like the most straightforward category imaginable. Six vendors, three or four tiers each, a monthly price on every card. In practice the figure on the card is a different sort of quantity at every one of them, and a table lining up six headline numbers is lining up six things that are not comparable.

Start with the one that is exactly what it appears to be. Paperform's annual total is precisely twelve times its monthly price on every paid plan, and its page describes it as such — 'billed as' a yearly figure rather than 'save' anything. There is no percentage, no crossed-out number and no claim of a discount, because there is no discount. A vendor charging twelve monthly payments and declining to dress that up is the honest baseline against which the rest of the category can be read.

Tally offers the same arrangement and describes it differently. Its billing switch advertises two months off for paying yearly, and the per-month figure it displays is identical in both states. No annual total is printed anywhere, so there is nothing to check the claim against. The offer exists as a label and not as a number, which is the reason our capture rule is to walk every toggle rather than trust whichever state a page loads in.

Fillout inverts the usual relationship in a way that repays a second look. Its displayed monthly figure multiplied by twelve equals the discounted annual total exactly, on all three plans — so the number on the card is the annual rate, not the monthly one. Beside it sits a struck-through yearly figure, and that figure divides by twelve into clean whole monthly prices which appear nowhere else on the page. The 'before' price is therefore implied rather than published: you are shown what you save from, without being shown the rate it corresponds to.

Formstack publishes something else again, which is a floor. Every figure on its page is a starting-at price, on both billing states, and what varies above that floor is not stated. Its upper plan additionally requires a minimum of three builder users, so the published number is not the price of any configuration you could actually buy — it is the least you could pay if everything above the minimum happened not to apply. We record it as a floor and quote no configuration price, because there is none to quote.

Only two of the six behave the way the category is assumed to. Jotform and Typeform each print a monthly rate and an annual rate, and each discounts genuinely for paying yearly — but by amounts that vary widely between their own tiers. Across their ladders the annual saving runs from under thirteen per cent to nearly twenty-four. Neither advertises a single headline percentage, which is the correct choice when the savings differ that much, and it means the discount has to be computed per tier rather than assumed.

Put together, the category offers a useful lesson about pricing pages generally. A monthly figure can be a rate you pay monthly, an annual rate displayed per month, a floor with no ceiling, or a number attached to a switch that does nothing. None of those is disclosed as such, and the distinction is never visible from the figure alone. The only thing that reliably separates them is whether the page prints two figures you can divide into each other — and in this category two vendors of six do not.

So the procedure is the same one that works everywhere and matters more here than most. Find both figures: the monthly rate and the annual total. Divide one into the other and see whether the result is twelve, less than twelve, or unobtainable. Twelve means no discount, whatever the page says. Less than twelve is a real saving whose size you now know. Unobtainable means the vendor has published a claim without the arithmetic to support it, and that is worth knowing before you commit a year.

One vendor charges twelve monthly payments and says so

Its annual total is exactly twelve times its monthly price on every paid plan, described as 'billed as' rather than 'save'. No percentage, no strike-through, no claim. That is the honest form of an annual option and it is the baseline for reading the rest.

Another offers two months off and shows the same figure twice

The billing switch changes the label and not the number, and no annual total is printed for the claim to be checked against. An offer that exists as a label rather than a figure is why every toggle gets walked and every state recorded.

One card shows the annual rate, not the monthly one

Its displayed figure times twelve equals the discounted annual total exactly, on all three plans. The number you read is what you pay if you commit to a year, and the monthly rate is not the number on the card.

And its 'before' price is implied rather than printed

The struck-through yearly figure beside it divides into clean whole monthly prices that appear nowhere else on the page. You are shown what you are saving from without being shown the rate that corresponds to it.

One publishes a floor with no ceiling

Every figure is a starting-at price on both billing states, what varies above it is unstated, and the upper plan requires a minimum of three builder users. The published number is the least you could pay rather than the price of anything you could configure.

Where the discount is real, it varies by tier

The two vendors that discount properly do so by anywhere from under thirteen per cent to nearly twenty-four across their own ladders, and neither advertises a single headline figure — which is the right choice when the savings differ that much, and means you must compute per tier.

Questions people actually search

How do I tell what a monthly figure actually means?

Look for a second figure and divide. If the annual total is exactly twelve times the monthly one, there is no discount regardless of what the page says. If it is less, the difference is your real saving. If the page prints only one figure, or prints a crossed-out total with no corresponding rate, then the claim cannot be checked and you should treat the printed number as the only fact available.

What does 'starting at' mean in practice?

That the published figure is a floor and the page does not say what raises it. It is not a price for a defined configuration, so it cannot be compared with a fixed price from another vendor. Where a plan also carries a user minimum, the real floor is that minimum multiplied out, which may be several times the number in large type.

Is a discount that varies by tier a bad sign?

No — it is usually a sign the vendor priced each tier separately rather than applying one rule. What matters is that a single advertised percentage cannot then be accurate for every tier, so a vendor with genuinely varying discounts and no headline claim is being more careful than one with a headline that only holds on a single rung.

Why do you not publish these vendors' prices as figures?

Because every one of them was read in a single market, and this guide appears in three editions. Rather than show American prices to British and eurozone readers, the comparisons here are stated as relationships — twelve times, per-tier percentages, minimums — which hold in any currency. The underlying figures are on the vendors' own pages and in our per-market tables where they exist.

Do you earn a commission from any of these?

No. We hold no affiliate relationship with any form builder named on this page, and this page carries no affiliate links. Our method is on the method page.

This page publishes no absolute prices. Every quantity in it is a ratio, a percentage or a count computed from figures the vendors print, because all six were read in a single market on 2026-09-03 while this guide appears in three editions. Relationships such as 'exactly twelve times' and the per-tier discount ranges are our arithmetic on the vendors' own published pairs. Where a vendor prints only one figure, or a struck-through total whose monthly equivalent appears nowhere, that is recorded as read and nothing is inferred to complete it. This page carries no affiliate links. Related: the annual discount you cannot check, how to read a price record and when there is no price. The method →

Found a price that no longer matches the vendor’s page? Tell us — corrections are dated and stay on the page.