Quo vs Nextiva: both entry plans land on $15 a user, and they get there from opposite directions
How to read this page: every number below was read from the vendor’s own public pricing page on the date shown, and the pages are re-checked daily. Currencies differ because that is what each vendor showed an EU visitor. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you subscribe through one we earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. Per our method, that never changes a number or a verdict. Source links always point to the vendor’s plain page.
Prices as this vendor showed them to a visitor in the United States — USD. A reader elsewhere may be quoted a different figure — we publish what we were served, never a conversion.
Prices as this vendor showed them to a visitor in the United States — USD. A reader elsewhere may be quoted a different figure — we publish what we were served, never a conversion.
Billed annually, Quo Starter and Nextiva Core cost the same: $15 a user a month. Not approximately, exactly. Two vendors, two ladders, the same entry figure, and if you read only the number each page shows you first, you would conclude this is a coin toss.
It is not, because the two arrive at that figure from opposite directions. Quo's month-to-month rate is $19. Nextiva's is $23. One of these vendors discounts a little for an annual commitment; the other discounts a lot, and the number on the page is the discounted one.
That is the comparison. Everything else follows from it.
On Quo the ladder is $19, $33 and $47 a user month to month, or $15, $23 and $35 billed annually — $180, $276 and $420 a user a year. The advertised savings, $48, $120 and $144, reconcile exactly against twelve months at the higher rate.
On Nextiva the same shape reads differently. Core is $23 month to month or $15 billed annually — a 35% cut, and the page says so. Engage is $50 or $25, which is exactly half. The discount does not sit still as you climb the ladder; it widens. A reader who works out the annual saving on Core and assumes the same proportion higher up will be wrong in Nextiva's favour, which is an unusual direction for that kind of error.
Nextiva's third rung, Scale, prints a single figure: $75 a user a month. No struck-through second state, no saving badge, while the two rungs below it carry both. We record the one figure and we do not infer the other, because the ratio that would produce it is precisely the ratio that has already changed twice on this ladder.
Then there is the second number, and only one of these vendors has one. Quo meters its AI agent, Sona, in credits: a hundred credits a call, a thousand credits included on every plan, and past that a monthly tier at $25, $49, $99 or $199 with per-call overage from $1.00 down to $0.45. Nextiva sells an AI receptionist as an add-on on every tier but does not publish its price on the pricing page, so we hold no figure for it. A team that intends to lean on the AI is comparing one published two-part price against one published price and one blank.
Both are priced per user, which is the reliable way to misread either. Three seats on Quo Business is $99 a month, not $33; three on Nextiva Engage is $150. The seat count belongs in the comparison before anything else does.
One last thing that is not about price. Quo is the vendor formerly called OpenPhone — the rename is recent enough that openphone.com still redirects and most comparison pages still use the old name. If you are cross-checking this page against another, and the other one says OpenPhone, you have just learned when it was last read.
Beyond the price tag
The entry plans meet at one figure
Billed annually, Quo Starter and Nextiva Core are both $15 a user a month. Month to month they are $19 and $23. The annual figure is where the two vendors agree; the monthly one is where they differ, and it is the honest basis for choosing.
How much the commitment is worth
Quo Starter saves $48 a year, Business $120, Scale $144 — all exact against twelve months at the monthly rate. Nextiva's Core discount is 35% and its Engage discount is exactly 50%, so on Nextiva the value of signing for a year depends on which rung you sign for.
Scale prints $75 a user a month with no month-to-month figure beside it, while Core and Engage print both. We record what is published and leave the other blank rather than deriving it from a discount rate that has already changed between the two rungs below.
Only one of them has a second number
Quo's Sona credits: a hundred per call, a thousand included, then $25 to $199 a month with per-call overage from $1.00 to $0.45. Nextiva names an AI receptionist add-on on all three tiers and publishes no price for it, so a like-for-like AI comparison cannot be made from either page.
Per seat, on both
Three users on Quo Business is $99 a month; three on Nextiva Engage is $150. Neither headline is a bill, and the ranking between two per-seat vendors does not change with seat count — but the size of the decision does.
Questions people actually search
Which is cheaper, Quo or Nextiva?
It depends entirely on whether you commit. Billed annually they are identical at entry: $15 a user a month on both. Month to month Quo is $19 against Nextiva's $23. If you want the option to stop, Quo is cheaper by a clear margin; if you are signing for a year anyway, price is not the deciding factor at entry level and you should choose on features.
Why is Nextiva's monthly price so much higher than its annual one?
Because the figure the pricing page shows first is the annual-billed one, with the month-to-month rate struck through beside it. Core is $15 annually against $23 monthly, a 35% cut; Engage is $25 against $50, exactly half. That is a real discount, not a trick, but the number a reader remembers from the page is the discounted one.
What does Nextiva Scale cost month to month?
Nextiva does not publish it. The Scale card carries $75 a user a month and no second figure, while Core and Engage carry both. We could produce a number by applying one of the other discounts, and it would probably be wrong: the discount is 35% on one rung and 50% on the next, so there is no rate to extend.
Is Quo the same product as OpenPhone?
It is the same vendor under a new name. openphone.com and its pricing page both return 301 redirects to quo.com, verified 2026-09-03, and Quo's own pricing page describes itself as 'formerly OpenPhone'. Our record holds no reading of OpenPhone, so we cannot say whether the prices changed along with the name, and we do not guess.
Do either of them have a free plan?
No. Both offer a trial rather than a free tier, which is the ordinary shape in business phone — the vendor is provisioning a real phone number for you, and that costs them money on day one.
How do these two compare with the rest of the category?
They are the only two of the ten business-phone vendors we read on 2026-09-03 that publish a full ladder. Dialpad, 8x8 and GoTo Connect publish no price at all; RingCentral hides its plans behind a user-count selector; Grasshopper publishes a single floor; Ooma and Vonage refused the read entirely. That is why this comparison exists and most of the others in this category do not.
THE VERDICT, ONE MORE TIME
Our pick: Quo — month to month it is $19 a user against Nextiva's $23, and the two converge on $15 only if you commit to a year.
Both entry plans cost $15 a user a month billed annually, so a buyer who signs for a year is choosing on features, not price. A buyer who does not is choosing between $19 and $23, and Quo is the one whose month-to-month rate is close enough to its annual rate that the commitment is optional rather than structural. Nextiva's discount does most of the work of making its price look competitive, and it is only there if you sign.
Both vendors read at their own pricing pages on 2026-09-03 between 04:00 and 04:20 CEST: quo.com/pricing, reached by following the redirect from openphone.com/pricing, and nextiva.com/nextiva-pricing, reached by following the redirect from nextiva.com/pricing.html. Both pages serve both billing states in their HTML, so neither the monthly nor the annual figure had to be inferred from the other. Every figure here resolves from that record at build time rather than being typed, so a re-read moves this page with it. Both vendors were read from a Swiss egress (Zurich), not from the United States: the pages served USD without a geo-redirect, so these are the vendors' USD list prices as shown to a European reader. What a US-located visitor is shown has not been verified, and the record says so rather than implying a reading it does not have. The method →
Found a price that no longer matches the vendor’s page? Tell us — corrections are dated and stay on the page.