Thu 3 Sep 2026
daily since 25 Aug
CONFIRMED
ZENDESK ▲ €1.5 appeared · 3 SepZENDESK ▼ $1.5 withdrawn · 3 SepWIX €29 → €14 · 3 SepTEACHABLE ▼ $10 withdrawn · 3 SepTEACHABLE ▼ $10 withdrawn · 3 SepSURFER SEO ▲ €42.33 appeared · 3 SepSENDPULSE ▼ €7.7 withdrawn · 3 SepROBOFORM ▼ €2.83 withdrawn · 3 Sep
all 59 →
Guide — Method

The same number with a different symbol: how AI subscriptions price across markets

When a product is sold in several currencies the vendor makes a choice that is almost never explained: set a price per market, or set one number and change the symbol in front of it. Reading the same AI tools in three markets on the same day shows both policies in use, sometimes within a single pricing table. The difference is invisible on any one page and it changes what you actually pay.

A price in a foreign currency can be arrived at in two ways. The vendor can decide what the product is worth in that market and price it there, or it can take the home-market number and print a different symbol in front of it. Both are ordinary commercial practice and neither is disclosed anywhere on a pricing page. The only way to see which you are being offered is to read the same product in more than one market, which is what our per-market captures do.

Riverside is the clean case of the second policy. Its professional tier is €35 a month and its next tier €45, and those same numerals appear in dollars, in pounds and in euros — read separately in each market on the same day. Nothing has been converted. The number was chosen once and the symbol follows the visitor. Whether that suits you depends entirely on which currency you earn in, and the page gives you no way to know it is happening.

Anthropic's Claude is the clean case of the first. Its professional tier is €15 a month here, and the figure is genuinely different in each of the three markets we read rather than one number re-badged, with the British and eurozone prices set equal to each other and below the American one. Its top tier behaves the same way. That is a vendor making a per-market decision, which is more work and produces a price that means the same thing to buyers in different places.

OpenAI's ChatGPT is the interesting middle, because it does both depending on the tier. Its entry paid tier is €8 and differs between the American and British markets while matching in the eurozone; its main tier €23 does the opposite, matching between America and Britain and differing in euros; its top tier €103 differs in both. Three rungs, three different answers to the same question, on one pricing page.

Synthesia makes the point most sharply of all, because the split runs inside a single ladder. Its entry tier €19 carries the same numeral in all three currencies. Its tier above, €79, is priced differently in each. One vendor, one table, one read on one day, and two different pricing policies stacked on top of each other. There is no plausible reading of that as an accident, and equally no reason to think it is improper — the entry tier is probably a headline number the vendor wants to keep round in every market.

What this means practically is small but real. If you are outside the vendor's home market and the numeral looks familiar, you are probably paying the home-market number rather than a price set for where you are, and the gap between those two is whatever the exchange rate happens to be doing. Over a year on a team subscription that is not nothing. It also means a comparison of two products in your own currency can be comparing a locally-set price against a re-badged one, which is a difference in kind that no table shows.

One caution about the limits of this, because it is the sort of claim that is easy to overstate. We can only say a vendor does not localise when we have read it in several markets and found the same figure. Where a vendor was read in one market only, we cannot distinguish a company that charges worldwide in one currency from a gap in our own reading, and it would be wrong to present the second as the first. Every vendor discussed above was read in five markets on a single date; the ones we cannot speak about are simply absent from this page rather than characterised.

So if the price matters to you and you are not in the United States, the useful check takes a moment: look at the numeral, not just the symbol. If it is the same figure your American colleague quotes, you are on a re-badged price, and the question worth asking is whether the product is still worth it at your exchange rate rather than at theirs.

Two policies, neither disclosed

A vendor either sets a price per market or sets one number and changes the symbol. Both are ordinary and neither appears anywhere on a pricing page. Reading the same product in several markets on the same day is the only way to tell them apart.

One vendor charges the same numeral in all three currencies

Its professional and growth tiers carry identical figures in dollars, pounds and euros, captured separately in each market on the same date. No conversion has taken place; the number was chosen once.

Another prices each market separately

Its tiers differ across the three markets rather than being one figure re-badged, with the British and eurozone prices set equal to each other and below the American. That is a per-market decision and it costs the vendor more effort than the alternative.

One vendor does both, tier by tier

On a single pricing page, the entry tier differs between two markets and matches in the third, the main tier does the reverse, and the top tier differs in both. Three rungs, three answers, one table.

And one splits the policy inside a single ladder

Its entry tier carries the same numeral in all three currencies while the tier immediately above it is priced differently in each. A round headline number in every market, with real localisation starting one rung up.

We cannot call a single-market read a pricing policy

Where a vendor was read in only one market, a company that charges worldwide in one currency looks exactly like a gap in our reading. Those vendors are absent from this page rather than described, because the two cases are indistinguishable from the data.

Questions people actually search

How do I tell whether I am being charged a localised price?

Compare the numeral, not the symbol, against the vendor's American price. If they match, the figure has almost certainly been re-badged rather than set for your market. If they differ, someone has made a decision about what the product is worth where you are. Neither is disclosed on the page, and both are common.

Is a re-badged price worse for me?

It depends on the exchange rate and on nothing else, which is rather the point. A number chosen for the American market and printed in pounds is not a price anyone reasoned about for Britain, so whether it flatters or penalises you is incidental. It also moves in real terms whenever the currency does, without the printed figure changing at all.

Why don't you show all three markets' prices side by side?

Because each edition of this site publishes figures in its own currency, and putting three currencies on one page would show most readers two prices that are not theirs. Every figure above is the one for the edition you are reading; the cross-market observations are stated in words and are checkable on the vendors' own pages.

Does this apply outside AI tools?

Almost certainly, and the AI category is simply where we have several vendors read in the same markets on the same day, which is what the comparison requires. The practice is not specific to any category; the ability to observe it depends on having dated reads from more than one market.

Do you earn anything from the vendors named here?

No. We hold no affiliate relationship with any vendor named on this page, and this page carries no affiliate links. Our method is on the method page.

Every price on this page resolves from a dated vendor record at build time and appears in your edition's own currency. The cross-market observations rest on captures of the same vendor in five markets, taken on 2026-09-01 for Riverside and 2026-09-03 for the others, with each market's currency recorded as the vendor served it. Vendors read in only one market are not discussed here, because a company charging worldwide in one currency cannot be distinguished from an incomplete reading on our side. This page carries no affiliate links. Related: how to read a price record, the price is not the bill and why a renewal is not the sticker price. The method →

Found a price that no longer matches the vendor’s page? Tell us — corrections are dated and stay on the page.